you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 2 months ago* (10 children)

TBH this is very cool.

It does put a lot of dense civilization downrange of the launch site, though. Thats... risky. Spaceports are often on eastern coasts for this reason.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    I think most launches are expected to be polar, heading southwards

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Do you think Starship will ever be reliable enough to fly over populated areas? Maybe not over big cities but like airplanes maybe?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago*

    I don't think any spacecraft is, not even the Soyuz rockets that were basically bulletproof for decades.

    No matter how advanced it is, a rocket is basically a giant soda can filled with explosives. The mass fraction is just so different than an airplane, so it has to be treated accordingly.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    The shipping lanes nearby are also pretty extensive. The NOTAMs will be pretty annoying. And there will definitely be scrubs from stray boats.

    I'm not sure where else to put one of these, though. Spaceport Camden?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    Well, what's wrong with the current Texas location? That's about as good a spot for a launchpad as anywhere in the US, except maybe Cape Canaveral.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments