334
Why does God allow evil and suffering? (lemmy.ml)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/atheistmemes@lemmy.world
87 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Its kinda hard for the creator of the universe to not be all powerful though. The other two are much more maliable.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Maybe He created the universe and then the universe took on a life of its own? In the same way that a parent may create a child but doesn't then have absolute power over the child or their behavior?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago

    That's basically deism. Which a lot of enlightenment thinkers believed in. That there's an all powerful God who just chooses not to be involved past the start. Grandfather clock Theory.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Are programmers all powerful over code they created and then released into the wild? (TLDT: No, but there is likely some control, especially over new versions)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago* (2 children)

    The metaphor would be code running "locally", not released into the wild. So yes. Whatever you originally wrote you could remove, rewrite, augment or fix. If god "released us into the wild" then god is not omnipotent anymore, and it also would never be required for an omnipotent entity.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] -1 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Perhaps, also perhaps the classic Jesuit argument that for judgement to be meaningful free will must exist applies. Similarly a scientist should state the results being experimented on before running the experiment rather than just running p-values on a bunch of resultant data and claiming whatever pops as the intended result. Perhaps God is a scientist with a multiverse of experiments with small tweaks to initial conditions. In that sense you'd have a bunch of (or just one) locally running code(s), but effectively in the wild for fear of tainting the results.

    I'm agnostic FWIW, I just find these ideas fertile ground for playing with thoughts.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Perhaps, also perhaps the classic Jesuit argument that for judgement to be meaningful free will must exist applies.[...]
    Perhaps God is a scientist with a multiverse of experiments with small tweaks to initial conditions.

    Not in any of the mainstream monotheistic views that would be relevant. They are omniwhatever as a matter of... well, canon, I guess.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent