you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 2 months ago* (3 children)

Well, theres a lot of experimentation with actual neural nets mimicing biology (or literally using biological neurons), and I think that could start to raise the spectre.

World model research could be a significant component of that.

In principle, OP is right; humans are just machines. All I constest is that transformers LLMs are even in the same ballpark, or possibly a path there... they are not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (2 children)

    Well it sounds like we agree then.

    I would think you would need actual biological structures to achieve sentience. That’s a lot different than what these people are calling AI tho.

    Edit: Also, if it is built out of natural biological pieces, at what point does it cease to be “artificial”?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

    Well biological structures can be replicated mechanically. So at risk of being pedantic, that's not strictly true.

    I view "artificial" as just a term for conscious, purpose construction, whereas "natural" does not involve any conscious intelligence, as in "naturally occurring in nature." But even that is a spectrum, I guess, with genetic manipulation, BCIs, all sorts of intermediate possibilities.

    I'd call a constructed, purely biological brain "artificial" because, even if it was grown naturally, it was built with conscious intent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment