you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 40 points 2 months ago (4 children)

I find the funniest part about this case is that flock has detailed logs on everything he did. Who could have guessed that the company dedicated to spying on everyone without a warrant would also be spying on the cops using the service? You wanna take bets on whether or not his usage was used to train an AI?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    And yet they let him do it 717 times without reporting it. Company working as intended I guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Just because something is logged, doesnt mean its monitored like that.

    Even without monitoring though when something does trigger someone to look, you now have a record.

    They absolutely should have been monitoring for things like this though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah I think it's a failure to monitor. But there's no monetary incentive to do that, so it won't happen without regulation, and the US doesn't have that political climate right now.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment