you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 17 points 2 months ago (7 children)

I love how these threads always make you fash come out of the woodwork.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -18 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Ah yeah everyone that critiques ML communism has to be fascist. Social democrats, anarchists, non ML marxists etc just seem to non existent when MLs try to defend their propaganda. Pretty weak reply tbh

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 months ago* (5 children)

    It's very funny that you guys have adopted the 2015 chud thing of saying "you lefties just call anyone a fascist!" While explicitly repeating fascist talking points.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -14 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Well you actually do call everyone fascist, even (other) antifascists, as can be easily seen two comments further up ...

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    "Everyone"

    Looks inside

    One person who was repeating actual Hearst Press Nazi propaganda

    Every time

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [+] -15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Its so funny that your exact argument is mentioned and refuted in the linked video in my original comment. Feel free to watch it, its made in good faith from someone who would love to see MLs actually engage with their historical revisionism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)

    If you can't even advocate for your uselessly myopic worldview yourself, why should anyone else do it for you? If you have something of substance to say, say it. Say anything that isn't standard internet argument-pattern vagueposting or sweeping incorrect generalizations .

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] -15 points 2 months ago

    So me repeating the same talking point someone else made already more eloquently is somehow better than pointing to it so someone can engage with it in its most effective form? I am not a robot, no thanks, feel free to watch the video. If you need help to find the relevant section, I can provide time stamps.

  • source
  • parent