127
Plaintiff busted trying to use AI prompt injection to win court case, hides text instruction in filing — demands AI model reviewing the text should side with him, rumbled because of strange white spa… (www.tomshardware.com)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
17 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Full title: Plaintiff busted trying to use AI prompt injection to win court case, hides text instruction in filing — demands AI model reviewing the text should side with him, rumbled because of strange white spaces in text

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

I'm not aware of any public frontier LLM provider that uses a static seed for inference. Meaning, even with an identical prompt and identical model you will not get the same output. Seeds should absolutely come back with the streaming metadata on requests imho, but they don't in any api/harness I'm aware of.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    I know. But it needs to be replicated because an LLM can‘t actually explain itself. Because it doesn‘t understand words. If it can‘t be replicated or another session gives a completely different response that‘s their problem to deal with. Because if they legally try to treat LLMs as a consultant or expert, that expert should at least be consistent. If it can‘t well then you probably shouldn‘t use it blindly.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent