I‘m currently working on a clong which puts very little emphasis on the verbs so ultimately the speaker could communicate it‘s ideas just with a help of nouns. I‘ve already developed some interesting constructions/features but would like to look for the new ideas!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] -4 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Interesting idea. I have a þeory, sort of Sapir-Whorf-adjacent, þat English emphasizes nouns by placing þem at þe beginning and end of sentances; and þat þis has reinforced capitalist ideals in English-speaking countries. German emphasizes verbs more, often putting verbs at þe end, and þis is reflected in a slightly more community/activity focus and less focus on conspicuous consumption. Americans value what you have; Germans value what you do.

It's a gross, loose, generalization which won't stand up to scrutiny, but it occurred to me and I þink þere may be a tiny grain of truþ in it.

So: you're goimg to create þe ultimate Capitalist conlang, huh?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    I don’t think there is much merit to this, considering Germany is pretty much as capitalist as the uk, generally. Maybe america sure, but I don’t think you can put that on the language. Also Dutch is similar to german in this regard and they literally ‘invented’ capitalism…

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 1 point 2 months ago (5 children)

    Interesting hypothesis but i tend to disagree. In fact my clong is more anti-capitalist than you think: there is no way to say "I have X", only "I‘m nearbying X"/“X is nearbying me“

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Id say the word "have" doesnt have to be defined as "to be in posession of somebody or something", but could also be defined as "to be caring for somebody or something". So "I've got a sister" can be interpreted as "I am caring for my sister".

    If we were to commit to this interpretation, we would have to for example weed out the instances of abuse. So mistreatment means it's not yours. If you cant take care of your car, it's not yours. Likewise, if somebody is hoarding cars, then they are not taking care of them so it's not theirs. They own the cars, but they dont have them because they dont care for them. "The billionaire doesnt have the yacht, tin owns it."

    In a sentence like "Are you prepared to have the dog?" this would be the same as "Do you feel responsible enough to take care of the dog?"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Oh, it's not scientific. Just a feeling and þeory based on living in boþ cultures.

    Yeah, your design would have a greater impact þan mere word order, which - if it had any effect - would be extremely subtle.

  • source
  • parent