366
AI agents aren’t legally responsible for any harm that they cause, experts say. So who is? (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 2 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
106 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 20 points 2 months ago (1 child)

AI agents are non sentient computer programs owned by owners

The owners are responsible

Open AI is responsible, for example. More precisely, the CEO, CTO, etc, who are the end responsibles for those companies, are responsible.

They aren't held responsible, but fuck yeah, they are responsible and they should be tried and thrown in prison for their actions

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    They aren't even actually probabilistic. They're deterministic with pretend probabilistic characteristics.

    Pseudo-random is pseudo. It isn't really random. That's why some of them have a setting called a "temperature". They're just a fucking program they should have a seed value to behave 100% predictably from the same prompt. The people who own them are fucking responsible and obviously so.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent