LilBobbyTables comments on Woman Calls Out Doctor Wearing Smart Glasses During Consultation Where She Had To Take Off Her Clothes: 'They Need To Be Banned'

[–] LilBobbyTables@lemmy.today 1 point 2 months ago (8 children)

Yeh I know, so clearly that way of doing it isn’t sufficient.

parent

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 point 2 months ago (7 children)

not sure what you're saying; there's multiple different bypasses. as long as creeps can record what they see without someone's consent to be recorded, they'll be creep glasses.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 7 child comments

[–] LilBobbyTables@lemmy.today 1 point 2 months ago (6 children)

So much the same as phones? Are phones “creep phones”?

There are multiple ways to prevent this, they just haven’t implemented any of them yet because the pushback hasn’t been loud enough, nor has anything been legislated.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 6 child comments

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago (5 children)

PHONES DON'T RECORD WHERE YOU LOOK.

Phones are visible! they don't look like spectacles. Why do I have to explain this?

I suspect you're just being duplicitous, certainly you've never tried to put your phone on your face or answer the glasses when you hear a ringtone.

Stop acting stupid.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 5 child comments

[–] LilBobbyTables@lemmy.today 1 point 2 months ago (4 children)

Now you’re trying to make a distinction between recording and recording exactly from your PoV? Why? Why does that make any difference?

Glasses are visible, and what I’ve been saying is that there just needs to be legislation and standards around making it obvious when smart glasses are recording.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 4 child comments