122
Share your share ratios (do we do this here?) (piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
68 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Feels very redditty, which is why I'm asking...

Also, what are total buffer size (what does it affect) and session waste (what does it affect)? qbittorrent-nox on Linux.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 3 months ago (6 children)

6 months x 0 upload is still zero upload. I permaseed most things but since I don't use a seedbox, I miss out on a lot of upload credit on new files since my home internet connection can't compete with a seedbox's upload credit. Luckily most trackers account for this and give you bonuses based on seed time so it doesnt really matter and having a mix of fast but short-lived seeders along with slower but long term seeders helps everyone.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (5 children)

    I have (need) a seedbox and can't really relate. But if you host it on your server that can perma-run it's not much different to what I am using.
    And just seeding will not guarantee any traffic. I have torrents that I cross-seed with wildly different ratios.

    My advice:
    See if you are even reachable (port-forward/no cg-nat)
    Try to move to a system that can 24/7

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (1 child)

    Unless your home internet has multi-gigabit upload, you'll never be able to compete with seedbox users when new uploads drop and everyone is downloading them at the same time. Your seedbox can upload at 10x-100x the rate my home internet can which is why seedbox users capture all the seeding credit on new uploads. Once a file has been out a day or two, the only people downloading are new users or people who aren't using automation tools like sonarr/radarr which are few and far between.

    The tradeoff here is that your seedbox storage capacity several orders of magnitude lower than my 50TB home server, so I can keep these files seeding forever much like the parable about the tortoise and the hare (though without the deeper meaning).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    My seedbox is connected at gbit speed, yep
    But I don't seed at that.
    Maybe at 5-10 mbps on newer popular stuff and only the large popular ones will I crack the 20 mbps range.

    Why? I suspect SSD seedboxes are "stealing" my rario, too.
    I am also in it for the long game with mine and download the smaller less important releases through usenet.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    That still involves downloading shit you don't want just to get ratio. Which is kinda stupid IMO

    I'm running 24/7, I've got one torrent running for 2 years with a ratio of 10 (and not even a small one) while most things get 0 kB up in even a year.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

    No? I just download what I want and try to seed it 1:1 (which is hard on private).
    Maybe in the beginning you need to do it to build up buffer and not download yourself into a leech-role.
    But once (my threshold is about 1:250gb (down/up) in ratio) built up, you can just coast along provided you arent downloading every remux you come across.

    And the racing is a serious issue, yes.
    BUT even I can't compete even with my gbit upload because I am limited by HDDs and the serious ratio farmers use SSDs.

    If I seed stuff it usually comes out to 2-10 mbps for maybe 2,3,4 minutes and that's it.
    Only the very large (>200GB) torrents are leeched of for longer from me. Probably because so few do continue to seed those behemoths.

    I'm running 24/7, I've got one torrent running for 2 years with a ratio of 10 (and not even a small one) while most things get 0 kB up in even a year.

    I have torrents from a tracker that is particular hard to build ratio on.
    Seeding since 2022 and a ratio of .6
    Heres more:

    So no, a seedbox is not the ultimate cheat you make it out to be.
    But it helps circumventing the networking issues :-)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    Huh? If you have .692 on a 4 year old torrent, that's a very good torrent to be seeding by my standards. I recently deleted a bunch of torrents added in 2024-2025 that were on 0.000-0.005 ratio. Almost nobody has downloaded them after me.

    Of the ones I've downloaded this year, only one 2026 movie has been doing well. All the older stuff is super well seeded AND nobody's downloading.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent