15
The internet is ugly, and benchmarks aren't helping as much (jeferson.me)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/programming@programming.dev
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Good used to have the lighthouse, which points to failure in the page. We can still have a 100% perfect score and the page be horrible (mine is a good example). Yet, the business pages are broken, links that aren't working, forms that don't submit, API's that can't load. When the page loads, to start with.

All feedback in the post is welcome.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Would it be rude to recommend a grammar checker? [...]

English isn't my mother tongue, and I do use a basic spell checker. But I have a gut feel that this isn't the topic. What do you mean by grammar checker?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    There are a few tools out there that can recommend improvements to grammar. For example, a tool might suggest rewriting:

    Benchmarks are a tool to validate a list of things, contrast, page load, images using modern formats, dead links, time to first paint, and semantic HTML, a <button> isn’t a <div>.

    to:

    Benchmarks are a tool to validate a list of things: contrast, page load, images use modern formats, dead links, time to first paint, and semantic HTML (i.e. a <button> isn’t a <div>).

    Many of them are now LLM-based, so you could probably just ask a locally-running Qwen3.5 or something for advice as well. Just be careful if you do this to constrain it only to grammar suggestions and not allow it to rewrite your article (LLM-speak is easy to spot).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •