Unlike X, it’s being actively developed

Wayland is 17 years old. That's beyond mature software, and you still can't RDP into a Wayland session. If you think that's niche, you didn't have a job during the pandemic.

So ya know, "actively developed" only seems to hold true for flexible definitions of active...

it might actually gain those missing features

Yeah okay, let's do that: let's finish Wayland and make it fully usable. I'm 110% onboard with that.

And to do that, looping back to my original comment, let's not waste energy and time on yet another brand new stack and let's not reinvent the wheel: you want a working Wayland (well, you have it apparently...), I want a working Wayland, everybody wants a working Wayland, and nobody wants Arcan because nobody is interested in reliving another painful transition again, was my point.