Not really. The most accurate thing would simply to identify the people who are saying such things as a group. Creating arbitrary correlation with some shared aspects is well arbitrary at best, or worse just a dog whistle.

And have you compared any such statements to comments made on any news website in English in the US? Because you get a shitload of stupid stuff there that has little bearing on anything whatsoever.

Sure, but go to any English conservative Christian community and you'll see similar posts, but we don't get big fearmongering posts about that. We don't get big write-ups about /r/conservative posters celebrating the ICE murders and how their beliefs are incompatible with Western liberal democracy, even though they are exactly as incompatible. We're literally living with the consequences of those beliefs right now, while people are still writing hyperventilating posts about theoretical consequences of similar beliefs.

All I'm saying is, selective reporting is misinforming, especially when there's more pressing matters. People have a bias against Muslims and hold them to standards that our own religious groups don't even meet. I'm not arguing that they don't hold bad beliefs, they absolutely do. I'm saying we need to deal with the same beliefs that already exist at home before we start worrying about that. Or at the very least, start painting with a broader brush and include all of it, not just the easy to pick on groups.