▲ 461 ▼ YouTuber Hank Green Is Facing a Fan Revolt Over His AI Use (gizmodo.com) submitted 3 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 422 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (5 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago (4 children) That’s exactly how that works lmao. “Anti” means “opposite”, not some neutral third thing permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] abfarid@startrek.website 2 points 3 months ago (3 children) anti-anti-AI ≠ pro-AI, it assumes there's only anti-AI and pro-AI and nothing in between. And the wording was clearly about the anti-AI mob as opposed to people who understand the dangers and benefits of AI. It's similar to the difference between a Gamer™ and a gamer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (2 children) The user is not in between, they’re pro AI. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago (1 child) So? That has nothing to do with the argument at hand, it's an ad hominem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago* You think that a persons established pro-ai bias is not related to the inference of the bias of their ai-related comment? I… disagree. That would be directly related. And it’s of course not ad hominem in the slightest because an ad hominem is an attack on a person instead of an argument. That’s not happening here. Your comment reads like a high schooler who just had their first class on argument and logic and hasn’t quite got a firm understanding of either yet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world -3 points 3 months ago (4 children) That’s exactly how that works lmao. “Anti” means “opposite”, not some neutral third thing permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] abfarid@startrek.website 2 points 3 months ago (3 children) anti-anti-AI ≠ pro-AI, it assumes there's only anti-AI and pro-AI and nothing in between. And the wording was clearly about the anti-AI mob as opposed to people who understand the dangers and benefits of AI. It's similar to the difference between a Gamer™ and a gamer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (2 children) The user is not in between, they’re pro AI. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago (1 child) So? That has nothing to do with the argument at hand, it's an ad hominem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago* You think that a persons established pro-ai bias is not related to the inference of the bias of their ai-related comment? I… disagree. That would be directly related. And it’s of course not ad hominem in the slightest because an ad hominem is an attack on a person instead of an argument. That’s not happening here. Your comment reads like a high schooler who just had their first class on argument and logic and hasn’t quite got a firm understanding of either yet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] abfarid@startrek.website 2 points 3 months ago (3 children) anti-anti-AI ≠ pro-AI, it assumes there's only anti-AI and pro-AI and nothing in between. And the wording was clearly about the anti-AI mob as opposed to people who understand the dangers and benefits of AI. It's similar to the difference between a Gamer™ and a gamer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (2 children) The user is not in between, they’re pro AI. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago (1 child) So? That has nothing to do with the argument at hand, it's an ad hominem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago* You think that a persons established pro-ai bias is not related to the inference of the bias of their ai-related comment? I… disagree. That would be directly related. And it’s of course not ad hominem in the slightest because an ad hominem is an attack on a person instead of an argument. That’s not happening here. Your comment reads like a high schooler who just had their first class on argument and logic and hasn’t quite got a firm understanding of either yet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world -1 points 3 months ago (2 children) The user is not in between, they’re pro AI. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago (1 child) So? That has nothing to do with the argument at hand, it's an ad hominem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago* You think that a persons established pro-ai bias is not related to the inference of the bias of their ai-related comment? I… disagree. That would be directly related. And it’s of course not ad hominem in the slightest because an ad hominem is an attack on a person instead of an argument. That’s not happening here. Your comment reads like a high schooler who just had their first class on argument and logic and hasn’t quite got a firm understanding of either yet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 months ago (1 child) So? That has nothing to do with the argument at hand, it's an ad hominem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago* You think that a persons established pro-ai bias is not related to the inference of the bias of their ai-related comment? I… disagree. That would be directly related. And it’s of course not ad hominem in the slightest because an ad hominem is an attack on a person instead of an argument. That’s not happening here. Your comment reads like a high schooler who just had their first class on argument and logic and hasn’t quite got a firm understanding of either yet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 point 3 months ago* You think that a persons established pro-ai bias is not related to the inference of the bias of their ai-related comment? I… disagree. That would be directly related. And it’s of course not ad hominem in the slightest because an ad hominem is an attack on a person instead of an argument. That’s not happening here. Your comment reads like a high schooler who just had their first class on argument and logic and hasn’t quite got a firm understanding of either yet. permalink fedilink source parent