you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 3 months ago (1 child)

So what would you call a head of state who happily and repeatedly conducts crimes against humanity and oppresses people?

Really depends on who is defining "crimes against humanity".

Which I didn’t do.

No backing away from it now

Blocking people who argue in bad faith is cathartic

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago

    Really depends on who is defining “crimes against humanity”.

    Define it however you want and answer the question. I'm sure you can come up with a definition that you find suitable, unless of course you're arguing in bad faith and refuse to take a stance on anything, which has been my suspicion for a while now that you continue to prove.

    No backing away from it now

    Yeah so you're leaning into something called a "straw man fallacy."

  • source
  • parent