1
This line explains all that needs to be explained and why IP monopolists hate AI and LLMs: It's because they CANNOT EXTRACT RENT FEES from it (tldr.nettime.org)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/programming@fedia.io
2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

This line explains all that needs to be explained and why IP monopolists hate AI and LLMs: It's because they CANNOT EXTRACT RENT FEES from it. And that's exactly why I LOVE AI and LLMs in particular. It totally anihilitates all pretensions to ownership of intellectual works. What matters are just your skiils, your ingenuity, your persistence, and your use of natural language. "The Oracle Contributor Agreement (OCA) requires that a contributor own the intellectual property rights in each contribution and be able to grant those rights to Oracle, without restriction. Most generative AI tools, however, are trained on copyrighted and licensed content, and their output can include content that infringes those copyrights and licenses, so contributing such content would violate the OCA. Whether a user of a generative AI tool has IP rights in content generated by the tool is the subject of active litigation."openjdk.org/legal/ai#Oracle #OpenJDK #Java #AI #LLMs #Programming #SoftwareDevelopment

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 1 point 3 months ago (1 child)

Major LoL: "What are some tell-tale clues of content created by generative AI tools?Sometimes it is obvious, for example when a commit message in the personal fork from which a contributor initiates a pull request includes a Co-Authored-By trailer line that gives credit to a specific generative AI tool. Other times it is more subtle, for example when a contributor’s comments in a pull-request conversation or an e-mail message are in a chatty, verbose style inconsistent with their past writing. Other clues include highly structured comments with multiple headings, unnecessary comments in code, gratuitously defensive programming, and the use of emoji characters.Generative AI tools are evolving rapidly, so clues that are effective indicators today might not be effective indicators tomorrow. In general, if something in a pull request seems uncannily cheerful or meticulous then you could be looking at AI-generated content."

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •