theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jul/23/cop-city-protester-phone

consumerrights.wiki/w/Common_Questions,Arguments,&_Responses_when_discussing_Flock_Surveillance

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 3 months ago (1 child)

Based solely on the fact that he protested the cops hq. That was their excuse after their illegal search attempt. If there was an actual suspicion, they'd have a warrant and be searching his property, not just holding him up at the airport for a few minutes.

Are you always this easy to fool? We all know this admin isn't going after actual child abusers.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 3 months ago

    I am not being fooled. I just understand how our justice system works. There is no rational thought process. Only consideration of the law. The prosecutors won't say anything about his protesting. They will only cite suspicion of CSAM.

  • source
  • parent