This again, isn’t the first time I’ve mentioned this ; given the severity of the activity, and the evidence I’ve provided, why hasn’t there been any action

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] -4 points 3 months ago

Even if the developer doesn't actively build a database of emails, the underlying server infrastructure inherently handles IP addresses, connection logs, and device fingerprints. Federal law enforcement agencies like the FBI and NCMEC do not need a username and password to track a criminal; they use subpoenas to demand raw server and CDN traffic logs.

- No website is truly "logless" unless the developer went out of their way to build a completely custom, untraceable server stack; which standard web hosts LITERALLY do not allow

Under federal laws like the FOSTA-SESTA legislation and strict federal criminal statutes, a platform cannot use "willful blindness" as a legal shield. If a developer builds a public chatroom, is formally notified that federal crimes are occurring on it, and responds with, "Well, I designed it so I don't track anyone, so I guess I can't help you," a court will view that as a deliberate choice to facilitate illegal acts

  • source
  • parent