This again, isn’t the first time I’ve mentioned this ; given the severity of the activity, and the evidence I’ve provided, why hasn’t there been any action

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

This platform allows users to generate pornographic content. Including for “underage users.” I hope everyone understands that the notice saying “you can only generate pornographic content if you give your word of honor that you’re 18 or older” is just a flimsy cover‑up. If a user visits a porn site (among other places), it’s only natural that they’ll see vulgar comments there.

As for your complaints — the site is basically being kept afloat by a single person. He’s also busy with work that brings in the money to fund the platform. He simply doesn’t have time to filter comments, he just doesn’t. Be grateful that the guy keeps the whole thing running at all.

Let’s just slap up a big sign that says “Adult site: leave if you’re under 18,” and that’s it. Of course, no one will actually leave, but at least formally, the responsibility will be offloaded.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    He has posted this like at least two times already or perhaps more, the Dev rightfully is ignoring him, I would too. He claimed in one post that the website has no moderation at all and when I mentioned that people get IP banned and reported he tried to come up with excuses as to how that did not count as moderation.

    "Internal moderation on this site is entirely absent and non-functional" ➡️ https://lemmy.world/post/49041435

    Another user asks in a separate post.

    Is there any resources I can run to stop being mass reported? ➡️ https://lemmy.world/post/48998802

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] -2 points 3 months ago

    Dev rightfully is ignoring him, I would too. He claimed in one post that the website has no moderation at all and when I mentioned that people get IP banned and reported he tried to come up with excuses as to how that did not count as moderation.

    You would ignore a complaint about a ring of distribution regarding illegal materials, and you fail to review my points, and you also are yet to address the inherent flaws with the “moderation” system 🫩

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] -3 points 3 months ago

    No, the issue isn’t pornographic material being spread to children, though that is absolutely a valid issue

    The issue is, people are distributing actual child sexually exploitative materials in the chatroom itself

  • source
  • parent