you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

Hmmm, I guess it depends on what you mean by capital. Because The Linux Foundation certainly has assets that they could donate to other FOSS project

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    The actual definition of capital. By the people that invented the term. A resource that is rented to another in exchange for part or all of the value generated by that resource. The Linux Foundation, being a non-profit, does not own any capital whatsoever, otherwise they would lose their non-profit status.

  • source
  • parent