you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 7 points 4 months ago* (4 children)

Not sure I see a problem here, this all looks intended. I'm not familiar with this device though. Since the heat sink plates are so big and the screws are so far apart I'm not sure they could get away with less without potentially missing contact with a sink. It seems more like bad mechanical engineering than bad application.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Thermal compound has a thermal resistance. It's better than air, but not as good as metal. The best application is a layer that fills all the air gaps, and no more.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    Adding to this... Airgaps is not emphasized enough here. There is a reason why you don't do closed shapes when applying thermal paste, and why so many system builders have strong opinions on how to apply it.

    Personally, I go for an X or a % where the os are actually dots.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago*

    Who is saying that is the major consideration here?

    Its obvious the major problem here is ustable movement and flexing when those large sink plates are screwed down will not distribute the paste very well resulting in a higher risk of air gaps. So they left a lot of room for it to press out and it doesn't look like they used a ton of that space.

  • source
  • parent