"Did you reduce the federal deficit?" the attorney asked.
"No, we didn't," Nathan Cavanaugh responded
...
“I think a person can have enough judgment from reading books and being well-informed outside of traditional experience to make judgment calls about obvious things like a grant that literally lists DEI in its description,” Nathan testified.
"What books?" the attorney asked
"There were no books,” Cavanaugh said.
Source - where I actually learned about it
If it weren't so depressing this would be some of the funniest shit I have ever seen. As it is, it's still pretty funny, seeing these clowns have to (fail to) justify their choices to real, serious people.