you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 41 points 4 months ago (3 children)

In a "healthy" capitalist environment, they take note of who can leave without any bumps in the road and lay them off

I used to have this boss who would get mad if anyone asked for 2 weeks off. She would say, "if you think the business can survive without you for that long, why do we pay you? Don't bother coming back then"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    That boss was a short-sighted moron. (I assume we all can see that). I hope that role is as high up the food chain as the Peter Principal will allow them to go.

    1). Hiring is expensive, scouting, ads, interviews, and paying HR do process their onboarding and benifits. The rule of thumb Ive see previous managers use is the total cost to hire someone is 2-2.5 times their annual take-home. Not to mention the effectivness of a new hire learning the role costs the company real resources, time and effort to bring up to speed.

    2). Your PTO is part of your compensation, and can be used within policy as you see fit. Failure to allow its appropriate use could be viewed as wage theft and there are very powerful leagl avenues (depending on location) to take if the case is big enough to bring against the employeer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)