ADHD

13,717 readers

563 active

2 users here now

A casual community for people with ADHD

Values:

Acceptance, Openness, Understanding, Equality, Reciprocity.

Rules:

No abusive, derogatory, or offensive post/comments.
No porn, gore, spam, or advertisements allowed.
Do not request for donations.
Do not link to other social media or paywalled content.
Do not gatekeep or diagnose.
Mark NSFW content accordingly.
No racism, homophobia, sexism, ableism, or ageism.
Respectful venting, including dealing with oppressive neurotypical culture, is okay.
Discussing other neurological problems like autism, anxiety, ptsd, and brain injury are allowed.
Discussions regarding medication are allowed as long as you are describing your own situation and not telling others what to do (only qualified medical practitioners can prescribe medication).

Encouraged:

Relevant Lemmy communities:

Autism

lemmy.world/c/adhd will happily promote other ND communities as long as said communities demonstrate that they share our values.

founded 3 years ago

moderators

submitted 1 year ago by AddLemmus@lemmy.ml to c/adhd@lemmy.world

The question came up during therapy.

Reasons:

The lisdexamfetamine is completely out-of-pocket, while the methylphenidate could be paid for by insurance. Even tried, failed and documented, future lisdexamfetamine would be paid for by insurance.
There might be a co-occuring autism spectrum disorder, and methylphenidate sometimes does a better job / less side effects, then.
While the Elvanse/Vyvanse completely fixed two symptoms, ability to focus and getting started with a task, more would be nice.

But, I'd like to stay functional, so is this attempt worth it?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] AddLemmus@lemmy.ml [S] 2 points 1 year ago

I see. Modafinil was decent at getting things started & done without the "high", but it is certainly not shy of risks and side effects itself.

parent