19
Three Parker 51 Demonstrator Clones (ennui-vagaries.cc)
submitted 4 months ago by to c/fountainpens@lemmy.world
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I have been nearly obsessed with finding a good set of Parker 51 clones. I've had several (from Jinhao and Junlai) that have been disappointing. While they had the look and filling mechanism that I wanted, many of them would fail in terms of writing well, or in drying out. What exacerbated these purchases was that they would all come up when searching for a “Hero 601” on Amazon, which is the pen I'd seen reviewed that was often praised.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] -1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Do note that they both rely on (included) cartridge converters.

That's probably one of the biggest things to me: having different filling systems. As I mentioned in the article, I have piston fillers, vac fillers, etc. I wanted to have Parker 51 clones that use the Vacumatic system.

I am surprised that you were disappointed in Jinhao pens,

At this point, I think the only decent one I have is the x750, and even those have an issue with the cap wobbling (but at least the seal still seems to be good). I've had at least a dozen other Jinhao pens (not just Parker clones), and they've consistently had issues from scratchy nibs to bad seals.

In contrast, Wing Sung and Hong Dian pens have never quite matched my expectations from reading online reviews.

These are the first Wingsung pens I've managed to get, so I can't say anything beyond this experience. Hongdian OTOH, I've not had an issue with. I have four M2s, two Black Forrest's, and a pair of C2s, and all have been exceptionally high quality. I would almost prefer the M2's over my Kaweco Piston Sport pens… But the Piston Sport is a piston filler, which I like over cartridge / converter pens.

One of the things I've noted is that many of the Chinese manufacturers have had inconsistent quality control, especially a few years ago. In particular someone pointed to Asvine pens they bought 1.5-2 years ago as having issues. It seems that in that time at least some of these companies have improved their quality and/or quality control.

But, I've also noted that many of the sellers on Amazon won't specify when the pen they are selling was released. It's possible that the Jinhao and Junlai pens may have been from a few years ago, and lack the quality control they have now. (But, this is completely a speculation.)

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    If the Jinhao 85 does look appealing to you in any way, and you can find it at a reasonable price where you live (I paid all of mine between 3 and 5€), please don't let the filling system hold you back, they are very good pens on their own, not just as a Parker 51 clone. And they manage to be a lot smoother with their steel nibs than the modern 51 with gold nibs, which I find disgraceful from Parker. Then again, their modern production is dismal.

    I would consider the x750 middle of the road for Jinhao, not up to the quality of the more recent models (this one has been around for over a decade), but not awful. But their newer stuff is a LOT better. The exception is the 100, which I find to be a little lower quality than its contemporaries.

    Hong Dian and Wing Sung, I have limited experience, 3 pens total, but too far from what I read online that I don't care to try any further. Not bad, but not good enough.

    A lot of Chinese companies still stick to the old ways of no QC and replace when the customer is unhappy. This isn't specific to the pen world. Though for a lot of Chinese pen companies, there is also the fact that their newer designs are also intrinsically better, higher quality overall, but not necessarily with changes in QC, just better design and manufacturing. The only Chinese pen company I know to have very tight QC across the board is Pimio. Hero also has some good QC on some of their stuff, but they also have lousy QC on other pens.

    Also, when buying Chinese pens, or anything Chinese really, I would very strongly advise to check AliExpress first, because they'll very likely be a LOT cheaper than Amazon. But even if they're closer in price, you'll often get a lot more choice in colorways, nib sizes, finishes, etc.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] [S] 1 point 4 months ago

    Also, when buying Chinese pens, or anything Chinese really, I would very strongly advise to check AliExpress first,

    You must not have read the article carefully. ;) I've been ripped off by sellers on AliExpress four times and have vowed to never purchase another thing through that site.

    I have, however, found a really nice reseller that (while a little more than AliExpress) is much better than Amazon, and very clearly labels their products. I have a review of some pens I purchased through them coming up.

    And, I think the “no QC” thing is changing. A bunch of the Chinese companies that have gone into “luxury” products (like watches and leather goods) have started realizing that QC is a necessity. Doodle Bud (on YouTube) has mentioned that Asvine has actually reached out to him to get feed back on some of their engineering and QC issues.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent