marighost comments on Dune: Part Three

[–] marighost@piefed.social 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

He deviates a bit but generally I didn't mind some of the changes. I kind of get why some of them were made, for easier digestion for wider audiences. I just don't really care for how he portrays Chani and Jessica.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

Not just "a bit"...he completely rewrote both Chani and Jessica's characters. He basically reversed their roles, for no other reason than because he fundamentally misunderstood what Paul's Character was supposed to represent.

It had nothing to do with "adapting" the story to the screen...he literally doesn't understand Paul's character, or why Frank Herbert wrote the story the way he did. So, he changed the entire story to match that misunderstanding.

This version may look great...but he butchered the narrative Herbert was trying to achieve. He actually managed to make the David Lynch adaptation look more faithful, by comparison. That's pretty bad.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 1 child comment

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 1 point 4 months ago

Not just "a bit"...he completely rewrote both Chani and Jessica's characters. He basically reversed their roles

I haven’t watched the trailer, this is supposed to cover Messiah, correct? Can you see how he’s going to deal with Children if he is changing major character motives?

Was disappointed with the tone/direction taken with Paul’s character in the last movie. If the director understands the story himself he’s certainly not doing a great job communicating it to the audience. I can see how he would need to write Messiah a bit differently to match the tone he set, but am struggling to see how he could maintain the story with at least passing accuracy to the major theme of the original.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent