Yes I have issue with thr framing Industry standard presented, because it is disingenuous. They imply that nato is arming and equipping Israel. Which it is not. Saying shared training and exercises is "backing" is just as silly as people getting upset that China was doing military excericises with Russia. Also, putting the "entire" onus on nato is also just as ridiculous, as you were so kind to point out that support doesn't just have to be weapons!

So, many countries support the genocide. It's not "nato" only, which is the russian bias industry standard is going for.

Why not say UN supports the genocide? Nato countries are part of the UN, the un uses nato logistics and equipment. If you see why that is a spurious argument, then you know why it's just as incorrect to say "nato". Say something like "most western countries continue to support the ongoing, Israeli genocide of the Palestinian people".