438
Use protection (sub.wetshaving.social)
submitted 4 months ago by to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
NSFW 20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 4 months ago (5 children)

Nah. Unnecessarily blurred (or, in the case of some user/client settings, completely hidden) posts are a nuisance.

Especially for something as innocuous as three letters of text.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago* (4 children)

    I don't think anyone will suffer if they don't see this (mildly interesting) post because they have chosen to hide nsfw content. I think anyone who decides to hide nsfw stuff has only themselves to blame if they miss the most interesting stuff.

    I find this "don't censor obscenities here, whe're not on F*c*book" mentality just as annoying as the censoring itself. If you don't like the way someone is writing, don't read it. There are millions of other posts for you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Fuckbook?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

    No, the thing I mean is much worse. I don't dare saying it's name, but it's a social network by **rk *uckerber*

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •