you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -62 points 4 months ago (18 children)

You can do the same with Sanders, AOC and even Mamdani (the rat just used it as a platform to get elected and then let Zionazis into his admin or just retained them whenever convenient...)

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    Like Malcolm X said: The ballot or the bullet

    All electoralism can ever give us is enough breathing room to organize. Rather than criticizing politicians I'd rather criticize an entire rotten system

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    TMW when you can do both 🤯

    Why should we not critisise rotten opportunists who stain the word socialism every time they misuse it to mean their "left"-liberalism?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    not really sure why my comment explaining the problem has gotten inundated with upvotes while your comment pointing out the problem has been downvoted into oblivion. you were at -2 when i woke up to check on the bear in my back yard.

    and yeah. we absolutely have to do both hence the Malcolm X quote

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    I hadn't heard that about Mamdani. A cursory search just brings up the usual articles about his anti-zionism being accused of antisemitism.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    From the very beginning he started "compromising" on most important principles and showed that he is nothing but a collaborator. Just because he is making capitalism somewhat more sustainable to prolong it's reign, doesn't mean he is socialist in any way, shape or form...

    Zohran Mamdani states he will have Nazis in his administration

    https://hexbear.net/post/6442067

    Zohran Mamdani calls Cuba and Venezuela dictatorships

    https://hexbear.net/post/6360301


    Other picked examples, in the end he is just a collaborator to capital that stains the word socialism:

    Mamdani's New Trans Direct Clinic Will Deny Care To Those Under 19

    https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/mamdanis-new-trans-direct-clinic

    https://hexbear.net/post/8725363

    Imagine policing your wife's likes on twitter because a bunch of people that hate you complained about them

    https://hexbear.net/post/7940512

    Trash recognizes Trash

    https://hexbear.net/post/7301730

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    This is impressive research, I wish users like this had the same level of energy for compiling these dossiers against literally anyone to the right of center (Most of the DNC).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I mean do we need to compile "dossiers" against politicians who are right of center for other socialists to read? The necessity of comments like that are because Mamdani claims to be a socialist and then does non-socialist things. By contrast, right-of-center politicians are proud of their vile actions. E.g., it's no secret that Biden and Harris materially supported the Gaza genocide because they are openly, explicitly, and proudly Zionists.

    Like at least in this community, we all generally agree that right-of-center politicians are monsters. It makes no sense to discuss them here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 23 points 4 months ago

    No, ya see, you can't because you literally just mentioned the 3 top progressives that have always been progressives in our current government. Their options haven't swayed.

    Either way, Kamala will never be the president I want no matter how hard she tries to pretend she will be. I just hope the DNC had finally learned that being the lesser of two evils won't win a presidency anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (-1 replies)