you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 4 months ago* (6 children)

did you 2× check these?

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202205/1266271.shtml

has no evidence, it's all libel

https://truthout.org/articles/nobel-peace-laureates-slam-human-rights-watchs-refusal-to-cut-ties-to-us-government/

Is an OPED, where in group A claims HRW has conflicts of interest. Not that it is true or not, but that Truthout decide to publish this claim.

https://web.archive.org/web/20181105214850/https://www.alternet.org/world/nobel-peace-laureates-human-rights-watch-close-your-revolving-door-us-government?paging=off

This is doing the samething as Truthout, giving these accusation a platform.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I am ML too. I’m intersecting “blind trust.”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago* (1 child)

    Two letters in this case being obvious shorthand for 'the guy you're nitpicking is on an instance by tankies for tankies, hiding behind an ingroup stalking-horse.'

    Response goes 'but I genuinely like that horse.'

    That is not the issue here, buddy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    Rules for thee, but not for me.

    Maybe if you actually bothered to read the articles I linked, you'd see there are plenty of verifiable sources for the statements they make.

    We just blindly trust the accuracy of OP, who didn't even bother to link to an article, yet discredit any suggestion that there might be bias at work in HRW because it's not widely covered by western controlled liberal media.

    HRW is just an organization trying to establish casus belli for western imperialism.

    https://www.ngo-monitor.org/ngos/human_rights_watch_hrw_/

    https://fpif.org/human-rights-watch-close-u-s-government/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment