you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 77 points 4 months ago (8 children)

Whose decision was it to charge 70-80 usd for a game?

Whose ai investments are buying up all the ram, gpus, and ssds?

Not consumers’…

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 4 months ago

    Seriously. These CEOs need to get their heads out of their asses and open their eyes. My gaming PC is from 2019. My newest machine is lower power than that. A steam deck. And they've ruined the steam machine pricing too.

    AAA games cost a lot, use basically all the same formulas from the past decade or two, and are expensive to make. They need to target less lofty graphics if they want to sell more copies. Less and less can afford bleeding edge hardware. Now is the time to double down in quality instead of fancy graphics. And this is why they're losing and indies are thriving.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 8 points 4 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    That fails to take into account the fact that the gaming was a niche hobby that wasn't particularly accessible in part due to prices. Given the far far larger market for games and the greater competition for gamer attention you would expect prices to come down.

    Prices are set base on what the market is believed to be able to bare however so value per hr or cost to develop are somewhat incidental to the monetisation of a game.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Prices for games have stayed constant for 35 years. Can you think of anything else that has stayed the same price in that time frame?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)