you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 6 points 4 months ago (6 children)

You can at least admit the marketing site is AI, yes?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] [S] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    Yeah, I used AI to help build the site and write some of the copy, I'm a solo dev not a marketing team. The app itself is the part I've poured the work into. Fair cop on the site though

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago

    I appreciate the candidness. Hopefully you can understand AI presentation generally implies an AI product, and without source code to audit, it raises some flags. Clarity of where AI is used as you've done here helps.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] -5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    i hope it is. it would be stupid to put time into things that computers can do better.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    The public site is the first impression and introduction of a product, and this one has all sorts of slop signs around it. You can see how that can make someone skeptical to the quality of application. I don't agree "computers can do it better" - I'd prefer a plain old website that gets to the point over one showing useless graphics, generated text, and non-functional interactions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment