▲ 26 ▼ Hacking the atmosphere: Geoengineering gets a reality check | Researchers are starting to explore the tools and systems we need to develop to cool down the planet. (www.technologyreview.com) submitted 4 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net 29 comments fedilink hide all child comments archived copy of the article
[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 26 points 4 months ago (4 children) This is MUCH Easier then CUTTING into Billionaires Profits! permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 months ago Yeah, this can even be sold so billionaires get even richer! And as the governments will pay for it, we all automatically pay for it How sweet is that? permalink fedilink source parent [–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago Yes it is, and yes, billionaires need to disappear Having said that, we may not have an option. We've allowed assholes and billionaires to destroy the planet for such a long time that we will likely need measures beyond capturing CO2 Hell, capturing CO2 itself doesn't make much sense until nearly all CO2 generating power sources have been replaced, and we're not nearly close to that. And even when we do start really capturing CO2, if we spend half the world's energy budged in that, we'd still need to keep that up for decades at least to get to acceptable levels. Yes, we've been pumping CO2 into our environment at alarming rates for a fucking long time, and all the energy we got in exchange also needs to be spent (plus a whole lot extra) to get it out of the atmosphere again. One of the things we can do is using the same pollutants from back in the 80s that caused acidic rain. Obviously this isn't what you want, but one of the side effects nis that it cooled the planet, which IS what we want. This could buy us maybe a few decades of reprieve permalink fedilink source parent [–] Auli@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago I mean history. Look at the push for recycling that we had. Why it is the only R that doesn't reduce profits. And turned out to be a lie. permalink fedilink source parent [–] QueenFern@lemmy.zip 1 point 4 months ago* Or cutting into their flesh with steak knives! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 9 points 4 months ago Yeah, this can even be sold so billionaires get even richer! And as the governments will pay for it, we all automatically pay for it How sweet is that? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago Yes it is, and yes, billionaires need to disappear Having said that, we may not have an option. We've allowed assholes and billionaires to destroy the planet for such a long time that we will likely need measures beyond capturing CO2 Hell, capturing CO2 itself doesn't make much sense until nearly all CO2 generating power sources have been replaced, and we're not nearly close to that. And even when we do start really capturing CO2, if we spend half the world's energy budged in that, we'd still need to keep that up for decades at least to get to acceptable levels. Yes, we've been pumping CO2 into our environment at alarming rates for a fucking long time, and all the energy we got in exchange also needs to be spent (plus a whole lot extra) to get it out of the atmosphere again. One of the things we can do is using the same pollutants from back in the 80s that caused acidic rain. Obviously this isn't what you want, but one of the side effects nis that it cooled the planet, which IS what we want. This could buy us maybe a few decades of reprieve permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago I mean history. Look at the push for recycling that we had. Why it is the only R that doesn't reduce profits. And turned out to be a lie. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] QueenFern@lemmy.zip 1 point 4 months ago* Or cutting into their flesh with steak knives! permalink fedilink source parent