I hear, not all but alot of men claim they are the more logical of the sexes but if that’s the case why consistantly do illogical things? - like not hold each other accountable when blatantly trying to intimidate, oppress and assualt woman/children? For a progressive and healthy world isn’t that counter-intuitive when you help the division within the community instead of working together and going after the real enemy? Elites/mega corporations/corrupt government etc? Also do y'all know that some of you or ur friends/family are being groomed by other men in power?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Most people by default tend to think they can do things better because we're shallow creatures and only look at the surface of those things.

What does it mean to be in a position of power? To gather all the benefits, decide who does what and what goes where. But do we see the competition, the rivalries, the sabotage in pursuit of one-uping the other? Do we see see the pressure of being in the center of attention at all times? To carry the burden of responsibility and required to be a model for others to follow? And to know that at the end of the day, one can do everything right and still lose?

Not everyone can be a leader, not everyone wants to share in the burden of responsibility. Because when things fail, and they do, it's the leader who has to fall on the axe.

Yet these positions of power, of leadership need to be filled. Those of us who know better, stay away, because we understand there are few benefits in that kind of position if you're not going to profiteer from it. The scoundrels, the liars and the crooks instead are all for it, as they care only for the benefits and the power, not the responsibility. So they lie, threaten and cajole, or even kill for it.

So the question you need to ask isn't why they the leaders. It's why aren't you? Think deeply and you'll find the answer.

You're not a leader, I'm not a leader and neither are most of everyone else. We let others carry the burden and put up with their inadequacies because we ourselves can't and won't take their place.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] -1 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    ......yea sure, neither of us are leaders but the ones in charge are doing a shit job so it's our duty as team-mates, followers or whatever u wanna label it as to work together and call each other and the leader out bc shit is fucked up and if we hold each other accountable that means the betterment of the group because if we dont, the group fails and we all suffer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    Sure. I suggest we form something like a union and elect a leader to do that for us.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] -1 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    Yes and no, it's really more of both. Should we elect someone? Sure, but we should also account for some personal responsibility. One person can't hold all that weight it's not reasonable and also dismissive. Something goes wrong? Easy! Blame that person and not our own personal actions. It's like leading a horse to water, u can't make it drink but u can guide it there ya'know?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment