you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 8 points 5 months ago (5 children)

I understand that. I'm making a statement that there were no mentions of war crimes. Let's do another round?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    They bombed a reservoir.

    That is a war crime.

    The article doesn't need to explicitly say "they gone and done some war crimes" for that to be the case.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    Almost certain that the person you're replying to is saying that the article should say that it's a war crime, not that it isn't one because the article doesn't say so.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 5 months ago

    This exactly. For the mouth-breathers out there who don't understand why it's a bad idea to bomb reservoirs, it's important to state clearly this is a war crime.

    Of course, the fucking US Government has done countless war crimes and not been prosecuted. So... yeah.

  • source
  • parent