21
When a Housing Boom Turns to Bust (Patrick Boyle) (www.youtube.com)
submitted 5 months ago by to c/politics@lemmy.nz
10 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Now, if you live in the United States, Canada, or the United Kingdom, you might be wondering why you should care about the real estate market on an island in the South Pacific. The answer is that New Zealand is basically a laboratory for what happens when an entire national economy is built on the assumption that house prices will just go up forever. It turns out that trading the same increasingly expensive boarded up bungalows back and forth with your neighbours does not actually generate any real wealth. You might ask how an economy gets into this position. The answer, as is so often the case, involves politicians. (~02:00)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [S] 4 points 5 months ago (5 children)

Thanks for sharing. I wasn’t aware. Also, TIL Hbomberguy.

The fact that people view housing as an investment opportunity is a policy failure; there are tax incentives among other things. The system only stays afloat if there’s a constant influx of new people joining, and we all know there’s a name for it - Ponzi.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 5 months ago* (4 children)

    We should not tax productive things; like income and GST. We should tax unproductive things, like sitting on property extracting rent. The entire system is bass-akwards for facilitating a real economy. "Old people get all the young people's value" is great until it breaks and everyone leaves. Then we're left with a bunch of "rich" old people and no young talent.

    There needs to be a serious shake up. This might be why TOP is polling above 5% now...

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    One of the ideas mentioned in this video is one from the 1800s saying that taxing income disincentivises productive work, and that we should only have a land tax (and no land improvement tax) since land itself doesn't change and can't hop on a plane and head to Australia.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    1800s is a bit vague: Progress and Poverty was late 1800s, like 1890. Georgism was probably the least bad tax until AI happened. Now a well architected wealth tax is probably the thing that will endure.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •