217
Android 17 sucks. So I put Linux on a phone. (www.youtube.com)
submitted 5 months ago by to c/linuxphones@lemmy.ca
39 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 4 points 5 months ago* (3 children)

No, I am referring to iodéOS.

iodéOS official supported devices

For example the Motorola moto g32 (devon) is compatible with their installer, and has its bootloader locked.

I had asked here - https://feddit.uk/post/49734939

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago* (1 child)

    The wording on that table can be confusing; "Bootloader locked?" Yes/No is referring to the ability of Iodé installer and ROM to have that device bootloader re-locked after installation.

    I can garantee you pretty much all of them come with a locked bootloader from the factory/shop (even if they have a "no" on that page), and it needs to be unlocked to install a different rom from the stock one. Doesn't matter what flavor of Android it is. It might be that IodéOS installer is doing the re-locking immediately after and so you'd think it wasn't ever unlocked, but it was.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago*

    Yeah, I took another look at it yesterday as I had worded it differently in my OP asking about it, and realised that it must be just presented incorrectly. I was wondering why I had asked differently.

    For example in my OP I asked why the Samsung has "No" across the board, and above, I asked why the Motorola has "Yes" across the board. Maybe it refers to if the Bootloader can be re-locked.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent