25
Every privacy app asks you to trust them. We ask you not to. (github.com)
submitted 5 months ago by to c/privacy@programming.dev
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

We build free, open-source privacy tools — encrypted chat, anonymous mail, untraceable voice, a whistleblower drop, a browser, a network layer. All given away.

But "free and open source" means nothing if you can't check it. So:

  • Source is public — read every line: github.com/Anon-Gratis
  • Hashes are signed — verify the binary matches what we published
  • Build it yourself — don't want our binary? Compile it from source

We don't want your trust. We want you to not need it. The only privacy tool that survives "trust me bro" is the one you can read.

🌐 anonymous.gratis · ✉️ admin@anon.gratis (PGP on site)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 5 months ago* (4 children)

Exposure

Then where’s their radicle instance?

are you not a developer and you just want to complain?

protip: for someone to subscribe themselves to this /c/, you HAVE TO pressume subscribers have modicum scripting and setup knowledge. Otherwise you read antisocial for not scoping who would 1) know what lemmy is, 2) subscribe to/c/privacy/, 3) respond in dissatisfaction to centralizing mirrors in fascist servers.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

    ASPD.

    So, what’s your preferred solution?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Ok, now you demonstrating poor reading comprehension. Reread my first answer.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •