982
Bernie Sanders proposes bill to give the public a 50% stake in AI companies (mashable.com)
submitted 5 months ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
212 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 16 points 5 months ago* (10 children)

If OpenAI fails, and the government owns half of it...

The assets and power the government acquired for no monetary cost simply becomes zero.

The other part of simply seizing half the shares is that the government (presumably a number of ministers/officials in charge of the new sovereign wealth fund) now has half the voting power of the entire board.

That is a pretty direct way to wield influence as to the decisions the company can make, how the CEO can behave.

You want maybe the accounting to actually deprecate the GPUs they have or lease over a realistic timeframe, instead of a totally bullshit one?

Half of your shareholders now demand this.

C Suite refuse to comply?

Begin the process of firing them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago* (9 children)

    OpenAI don't own any GPU, they lease it from Microsoft or from Oracle. Oracle bought GPU by emitting billions of dollars of corporate bonds. OpenAI only owns AI models that they copy to datacenters. Same is with Anthropics. They own no datacenter or GPU they just lease it from other parties.

    Bernie Sanders is putting taxpayers responsible for overspending on datacenters and make datacenters bailout. He should propose that all models should be open to public if they are used by government organizations so it can be independently audited by researchers. That would prevent those companies to cause harm to people.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
    •
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (8 children)

    xAI is now (or will very soon be) part of SpaceX.

    They physically own massive 'Colossus' datacenters with tons of GPUs.

    As to leasing vs owning, I already addressed that.

    If you are the government and you are half of the shareholders, you can pressure your own AI company, or the companies from whom your AI company leases GPUs from to be more honest and transparent regarding accounting methodologies.

    Bernie is not proposing that any taxpayer money be put toward this at all.

    The only actual expense here would be the minute cost of simply hiring some people to run and manage the sovereign wealth fund. Miniscule in comparison to the potential equity value of $$$s being managed. Think something like the administrative cost of running say, the SEC or FTC, in comparison to the amount of money moving around that they can affect.

    He is proposing the government simply half nationalize these companies, as Trump not long ago did with TikTok.

    If the government is half of every US based AI company's board, they can also very effectively pressure them to make the models open source.

    Not sure if you don't understand the concept of nationalization, but basically, thats when the government looks at something and says 'i own this now, because I say so'.

    Theres no payment. Its... why I use the word 'seize'.

    Same way Marx argued that workers should 'seize' the means of production: Just take them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
    •
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    SpaceX is another flop. It's main income is from NASA. $30B in long term debt, they estimate $1.75T valuation only year they showed any profit was in 2024 and it was $242M. Just to compare the private company that literally landed on moon Firefly Aerospace is worth $7B valuation debuted last year. -38% on NASDAQ. I'm not from US you're living in some bad dream right now. Wake up people because they are fucking you in the ass and you're clapping.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago* (2 children)

    I agree that SpaceX is a fiscal shitshow.

    Would you rather own half of it for no cost?

    Or own none of it for no cost?

    If you own half of it for no cost, you have a substantial ability to ... tell it what to do, with its people, its assets, its stuff, its technology.

    If you own none of it for no cost, you do not have this ability.

    In both scenarios, if the stock value goes to zero, you lose nothing, because you paid nothing.

    Again, you seem to be struggling with the concept of nationalization.

    The government just takes stuff over, because it says so, and it is the government.

    No one is compensated, no one is paid.

    In the US, cops can do this thing called asset seizure.

    You get pulled over for a dead taillight.

    You own a carwash and you're on your way to deposit the month's excess cash into the business account at your bank.

    Cop decides you smell like marijuana, finds your cash and your well kept accounting records.

    Doesn't matter, that might be drug money, cops take the money.

    Imagine that, but with stocks instead.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    But is it critical infrastructure ?

    Country should own roads, hospitals, power plants, water, lend land for farmers instead of Bill Gates owning 1 / 4000 of your farm land, communal housing, things that serve people so country should make sure everyone have access to it. Not what serve corporations and rich and push money there. Probably half of your 401k money are already there if you follow the dots.

    It would be better to nationalize or buy office buildings from corporations and use this money. Tax their assets from tax havens. Tax them until instead of crying they start begging. Now your country are treating those companies like little babies.

    You have different mindset, that's what I'm trying to explain.

    You should have free healthcare and free education like in Europe. Cheap transportation across country in trains, bike lanes. Cheap food and houses. Be happy. Why you can't travel by train from New York to Los Angeles ? Russia that everyone laughs from and hates because their politicians are idiots, they can travel from Moscow to Vladivostok.

    Instead of that you're launching farts towards moon and chasing demons in computers.

    People over power.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago

    You are having an entirely different conversation at this point.

    I'm talking about the specific proposed law from Bernie.

    You're talking about a whole whole lot more than that.

    Yeah, I agree, we need to make a whole lot of changes over here, but... that's way off topic.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent