128
Kremlin outraged by detention of Russian shadow fleet tanker, calls it "piracy" (www.pravda.com.ua)
submitted 5 months ago by to c/world
57 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Depends on the ship. You may remember an incident a few months ago where the US intercepted a tanker departing Venuzuela. The tanker was trying to evade sanctions by flying a false flag. This made it stateless and therefore it was within the rights of the US to sieze it and its cargo.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (3 children)

    US to sieze it and its cargo.

    Is it really? I get seizure and everything, but selling it - I guess that could be possible only if owner didn't pay a fine and wouldn't oppose it legally?

    OTOH what'd happen if the ship is in order and it still happened that? Or just seizure and torture of its crew just like happened with Global Sumud Flotilla?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 5 months ago (2 children)

    Getting off topic here. The actions of a state may not be lawful or justifiable, but they aren’t piracy.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •