you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 80 points 5 months ago (5 children)

The wording also struck a nerve because many AI models were trained on enormous amounts of publicly available internet data such as books, articles, forums and creative work created by millions of people who were never directly compensated.

That's much too kind. We were never indirectly compensated, either.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 41 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    and creative work created by millions of people who were never directly compensated.

    That's much too kind. We were never indirectly compensated, either.

    We were never even asked for permission to use our works and words.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 12 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    It also means there's nothing unique about their AI that couldn't be replicated by someone else.

    He's basically selling bottled tap water, you can get the same thing by just going into your kitchen. There is no actual product.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    Oh, of course. It's all lowest-common-denominator, mediocre bullshit. If they could come up with something unique, that would be actual intelligence.

    If you want to test this out, try asking for "novel" or "unusual" output. It's still derivative, but perhaps just a little bit less derivative than standard output.

  • source
  • parent