you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 57 points 5 months ago (12 children)

At least canals are still useful to have around for recreational watersports.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Not really. Most of these old canals were only a couple yards/meters wide and dried up 100 years ago.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 5 months ago (1 child)

    If they're only a couple meters wide, how the heck are they supposed to fit watercraft?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago

    The barges were just a little less than a few meters wide. The manpower to build a 100km long canal that is 2.5-3 meters wide is substantially less than what it takes to dig one 8 meters wide in the era before steam shovels.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 40 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    The Internet has ruined me because I can't read the word "watersports" without thinking of the fetish anymore.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments