you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 18 points 5 months ago (1 child)

it absolutely is not. my first thought to seeing this is that they're trying to reduce the resistance to the bill, then later add linux to it and not face as much backlash. basically, option 2.

dont be blind.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago

    So to not have the win we think it is, the California and Colorado bills would have to mandate age verification for open source operating systems.

    Can you explain the wording in the law that contradicts OP’s claims?

  • source
  • parent