I don't know why you think linking the same video as was in the comment I just replied to adds any value. Are you that video's creator? Is this all just a way to drive clicks?

You obviously didn't watch the interview with the actual company's CEO that I linked. Let alone read the comments under it. Let me share one.

Despite all the signs that this was a parody, I literally paid them 50 cents for a test "liberation" to see if it was a joke. The tool actually did something, but not only did it violate cleanroom logic by including implementation instructions in the documentation, but the "liberated" code runs almost twice as slow as the original. And to make it even funnier, the "liberated" code was licensed under... the exact same MIT license as the original.

So…it doesn't do what it says it does.

It's a company literally called "evil". The CEO did an interviewer with an AI satirist and he completely refused to take it seriously, saying things like "we receive a lot of love letters…asking as where we live", "we're liberating the world of open source software", and "if people don't like the work that we do, they might like the work that our customers do even less, because our customers are the ones that are paying us for our services, and we're just making our bag".

This is obviously not a serious product.

it ends when whoever buys their services realizes they're spending more with duct tape around generated code than just by using an open source library and giving credit