you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[+] -11 points 5 months ago (15 children)

Use your brain. Why are there conflicting reports?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 5 months ago (5 children)

    Do you really think I'm not aware of the implications here and the fact that president and every member of his admin are chronically dishonest? All I've done is note what different outlets are reporting. Thanks though, I'll try to "use my brain".

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [+] -7 points 5 months ago (4 children)

    You seem to be unaware of what I was asking, whether intentional or not I'm not sure.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

    Pretty obviously you were implying that it was not due to her husband's health, but rather that Trump wanted her out, as the supposed insider said. Sure, I believe that. I'd even go further and ask who gave this probable Russian agent's husband rare bone cancer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 months ago (8 children)

    I'm not sure the reports do conflict. What the reports say do conflict, but at their base level, they are just reports of what different people are claiming.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (7 children)

    I’m not sure the reports do conflict. What the reports say do conflict.

    Huh!?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 5 months ago (6 children)
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (5 children)
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (4 children)

    So you just conveniently opted out of quoting the last part, chose to argue about that choice, and you're going to triple down?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (3 children)

    Motherfucker I will **quadruple down __ ** on the fact that the additional context does not make it any more clear, that's why I didn't quote it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (2 children)

    It's simple. You're critizing the company for reporting two separate opinions/lies/whatever it was. Those reports are accurate. The content of the quotes from them may not be.

    I know you know that, but I decided to type it out with more words just to mitigate any "nuh uh" bullshit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago (1 child)

    I criticized no one. And you know I didn't. I'm blocking you now, troll. Bye!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 5 months ago*

    Lol you're out of your mind. You know we can scroll up and read? You start with criticizing Reuters, then criticized Zeppo while also talking down to them because you refuse to do what you're asking of others.

  • source
  • parent