alternative video upload: https://streamable.com/e/9u7ba2

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Really? Here's something from after the trial where Corner was found guilty of GBH (his 32nd conviction)BBC News - Palestine Action activists guilty of Elbit Systems site raid - BBC News https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cm2p99rxr5po?app-referrer=search

They put forward that defence in trial but the video obviously doesn't back up their turn of events, because the victim wasn't holding a hammer.

I suppose you will believe whatever suits your narrative but I prefer to base my opinion on actual facts.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago (1 child)

    but I prefer to base my opinion on actual facts.

    A police officers statement is not a fact, and historically has always been a distortion to maximise victimisation of their institution and ensure they can inflict violence on the vulnerable.

    Taking the narrative of a police officer positions you are very naive.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Then perhaps base your opinion on what was said by the protestors themselves who stated in court that they were not in fact attacked with a hammer as you say.

    Isn't the more likely explanation that a violent thug gave a weak excuse for battering a woman and that excuse didn't hold up to the slightest scrutiny?

  • source
  • parent