▲ 781 ▼ Former GM Executive: BYD cars are good in terms of design, features, price, quality. If we let BYD into the U.S. market, it could end up destroying american manufacturers (www.nytimes.com) submitted 1 year ago by Davriellelouna@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world 317 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (11 children) It's not a free market. BYD is heavily subsidized . permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 11 child comments replies: [–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 27 points 1 year ago (2 children) American car makers famously unsubsidized and holding up their own pants. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 year ago The oil industry is famously completely independent from government subsidy. Especially when it comes to setting urban development policy and planning transportation systems, these have no bearing at all oil demand and they also cost nothing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Compared globally? Yeah mostly so. What subsides do US cars get that other countries don't have similar programs? permalink fedilink source parent [–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (7 children) Pretty sure big oil and car companies have been bailed out by the US government in the past. Plus america designs most of its cities so that you need to own a car. Seems like both markets are equally "free" at the end of the day. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago The majority shareholder at GM is the US treasury. One of the majority holders at Stelantis is their workers' union. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_the_2008%E2%80%932010_automotive_industry_crisis_on_the_United_States permalink fedilink source parent [–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (5 children) A one time loan which made money is hardly a subsidy by comparison to China right now. That's an absurd comparison. Apples to oranges. Hell apples to baseballs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (4 children) There is also CAFE standards that made small, effecient vehicles require extremely high emissions standards while allowing looser standards for larger, less effecient vehicles. Effectively limiting foriegn market influence while increasing both the price and size of the average vehicle on American roads. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) That's not a competitive subsidy though. Anyone can and don take advantage of those emissions. The US does not have access to China subsidized materials or labor to compete in that market. BYD could build here and take advantage of that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) The US actually heavily tariffs foreign-made vehicles that could skirt the CAFE requirements the way American trucks do. Light trucks suffer the Chicken Tax and can only be made in Canada, US or Mexico to bypass that. Been that way since the UAW boss asked LJB to do something about the German imports growing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) So build them here, like every other foreign auto maker. They accomplish two completely different effects by two completely different mechanisms. The former being available to every manufacturer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago So it's not free market after all because the big 3 can make vehicles at home and sell abroad while the others have to make them in the US for the US market. In what way is it not a form of favoring the domestic auto companies? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 27 points 1 year ago (2 children) American car makers famously unsubsidized and holding up their own pants. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 year ago The oil industry is famously completely independent from government subsidy. Especially when it comes to setting urban development policy and planning transportation systems, these have no bearing at all oil demand and they also cost nothing. permalink fedilink source parent [–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Compared globally? Yeah mostly so. What subsides do US cars get that other countries don't have similar programs? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 year ago The oil industry is famously completely independent from government subsidy. Especially when it comes to setting urban development policy and planning transportation systems, these have no bearing at all oil demand and they also cost nothing. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Compared globally? Yeah mostly so. What subsides do US cars get that other countries don't have similar programs? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (7 children) Pretty sure big oil and car companies have been bailed out by the US government in the past. Plus america designs most of its cities so that you need to own a car. Seems like both markets are equally "free" at the end of the day. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 7 child comments replies: [–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago The majority shareholder at GM is the US treasury. One of the majority holders at Stelantis is their workers' union. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_the_2008%E2%80%932010_automotive_industry_crisis_on_the_United_States permalink fedilink source parent [–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (5 children) A one time loan which made money is hardly a subsidy by comparison to China right now. That's an absurd comparison. Apples to oranges. Hell apples to baseballs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (4 children) There is also CAFE standards that made small, effecient vehicles require extremely high emissions standards while allowing looser standards for larger, less effecient vehicles. Effectively limiting foriegn market influence while increasing both the price and size of the average vehicle on American roads. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) That's not a competitive subsidy though. Anyone can and don take advantage of those emissions. The US does not have access to China subsidized materials or labor to compete in that market. BYD could build here and take advantage of that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) The US actually heavily tariffs foreign-made vehicles that could skirt the CAFE requirements the way American trucks do. Light trucks suffer the Chicken Tax and can only be made in Canada, US or Mexico to bypass that. Been that way since the UAW boss asked LJB to do something about the German imports growing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) So build them here, like every other foreign auto maker. They accomplish two completely different effects by two completely different mechanisms. The former being available to every manufacturer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago So it's not free market after all because the big 3 can make vehicles at home and sell abroad while the others have to make them in the US for the US market. In what way is it not a form of favoring the domestic auto companies? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago The majority shareholder at GM is the US treasury. One of the majority holders at Stelantis is their workers' union. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_the_2008%E2%80%932010_automotive_industry_crisis_on_the_United_States permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (5 children) A one time loan which made money is hardly a subsidy by comparison to China right now. That's an absurd comparison. Apples to oranges. Hell apples to baseballs. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 5 child comments replies: [–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (4 children) There is also CAFE standards that made small, effecient vehicles require extremely high emissions standards while allowing looser standards for larger, less effecient vehicles. Effectively limiting foriegn market influence while increasing both the price and size of the average vehicle on American roads. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) That's not a competitive subsidy though. Anyone can and don take advantage of those emissions. The US does not have access to China subsidized materials or labor to compete in that market. BYD could build here and take advantage of that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) The US actually heavily tariffs foreign-made vehicles that could skirt the CAFE requirements the way American trucks do. Light trucks suffer the Chicken Tax and can only be made in Canada, US or Mexico to bypass that. Been that way since the UAW boss asked LJB to do something about the German imports growing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) So build them here, like every other foreign auto maker. They accomplish two completely different effects by two completely different mechanisms. The former being available to every manufacturer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago So it's not free market after all because the big 3 can make vehicles at home and sell abroad while the others have to make them in the US for the US market. In what way is it not a form of favoring the domestic auto companies? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (4 children) There is also CAFE standards that made small, effecient vehicles require extremely high emissions standards while allowing looser standards for larger, less effecient vehicles. Effectively limiting foriegn market influence while increasing both the price and size of the average vehicle on American roads. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) That's not a competitive subsidy though. Anyone can and don take advantage of those emissions. The US does not have access to China subsidized materials or labor to compete in that market. BYD could build here and take advantage of that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) The US actually heavily tariffs foreign-made vehicles that could skirt the CAFE requirements the way American trucks do. Light trucks suffer the Chicken Tax and can only be made in Canada, US or Mexico to bypass that. Been that way since the UAW boss asked LJB to do something about the German imports growing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) So build them here, like every other foreign auto maker. They accomplish two completely different effects by two completely different mechanisms. The former being available to every manufacturer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago So it's not free market after all because the big 3 can make vehicles at home and sell abroad while the others have to make them in the US for the US market. In what way is it not a form of favoring the domestic auto companies? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (3 children) That's not a competitive subsidy though. Anyone can and don take advantage of those emissions. The US does not have access to China subsidized materials or labor to compete in that market. BYD could build here and take advantage of that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) The US actually heavily tariffs foreign-made vehicles that could skirt the CAFE requirements the way American trucks do. Light trucks suffer the Chicken Tax and can only be made in Canada, US or Mexico to bypass that. Been that way since the UAW boss asked LJB to do something about the German imports growing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) So build them here, like every other foreign auto maker. They accomplish two completely different effects by two completely different mechanisms. The former being available to every manufacturer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago So it's not free market after all because the big 3 can make vehicles at home and sell abroad while the others have to make them in the US for the US market. In what way is it not a form of favoring the domestic auto companies? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago (2 children) The US actually heavily tariffs foreign-made vehicles that could skirt the CAFE requirements the way American trucks do. Light trucks suffer the Chicken Tax and can only be made in Canada, US or Mexico to bypass that. Been that way since the UAW boss asked LJB to do something about the German imports growing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) So build them here, like every other foreign auto maker. They accomplish two completely different effects by two completely different mechanisms. The former being available to every manufacturer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago So it's not free market after all because the big 3 can make vehicles at home and sell abroad while the others have to make them in the US for the US market. In what way is it not a form of favoring the domestic auto companies? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) So build them here, like every other foreign auto maker. They accomplish two completely different effects by two completely different mechanisms. The former being available to every manufacturer. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago So it's not free market after all because the big 3 can make vehicles at home and sell abroad while the others have to make them in the US for the US market. In what way is it not a form of favoring the domestic auto companies? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago So it's not free market after all because the big 3 can make vehicles at home and sell abroad while the others have to make them in the US for the US market. In what way is it not a form of favoring the domestic auto companies? permalink fedilink source parent