Technology

technology@lemmy.world

89,574 readers

13,839 active

2,408 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago

moderation log

moderators

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

Guilty until proven innocent: shoppers falsely identified by facial recognition system struggle to clear their names (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 6 months ago by Deep@mander.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world

37 comments fedilink hide all child comments

People shamed and ordered to leave shops after being misidentified then ‘given no help’ to investigate verdicts

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 11 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Those using it don't care if they get false positives, so it's working as far as they're concerned.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

hideshow 2 child comments

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 3 points 6 months ago

To them it's more trouble to actually double check or review hits then to just give people a blanket ban if they might could possibly be shoplifters.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 1 point 6 months ago

Yeah someone was explaining how false positives specifically within the context of early markers of pancreatic cancer are actually not much of a concern.

permalink

fedilink

source

parent