No, the original definition of captors.
... an 18th century AD etymology has little to do with Roman law, unless your understanding of history, already impressively bad, is even worse than previously suggested. Capere is a legal term in Roman law, so if you aren't actually using that in its intended meaning, I'd advise you to fuck off and stop embarrassing yourself by trying to pretend to know anything about the subject being discussed.
Did Romans capture and kept slaves, or did they not?
Yes? That was never in dispute. Unless you think cops are a necessary institution for slavery?
Property law to own slaves ? And enforce your demands on them?
... you do realize what 'police' refers to, right.