you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 43 points 6 months ago (15 children)

I tried one just for shits a giggles awhile back to see if there is any merit to the widespread use of them. The only way you'd find these even remotely realistic or interesting is if you've never had any kind of sexual encounter with a real person before, whether in person or through text. After about five minutes of "chatting" with one of these bots it started to respond like half baked fan fiction that didn't understand the basics of sex or even anatomy. The cadence is very predictable and it tends to repeat the same wording and phrasing constantly. If you have real world experience with people, it just feels like a generic chatbot.

In my opinion, this is more proof that these people need to interact with real humans. If these chat bots seem at all human to you, you need to interact with more actual humans.

  • source
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    We need third places again. Having everything at home is bad for us, but doing everything at home is framed and sold to us as the state of the art status quo. Our tendencies to avoid rejection and conflict are being preyed on and encouraged by the Epstein class because it's most convenient for THEM that we rot alone in our houses. Almost everything that's sold as "convenience" is just another way to avoid each other, and here we are.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 6 months ago (6 children)

    I really don't understand how anyone could want to chat with bots in general. Do people lack the ability to appreciate the genuine. It explains how you get people like trump. Who wants that kind of interaction?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    There are people that suffer from isolation, anxiety, depression, trauma or a host of other issues over which they have no control or support structures to address their problems. Of course, these bots aren’t a solution but they are accessible. It’s no wonder why people would use them.

    They deserve sympathy not condescension.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    no control or support structures to address their problems

    this is a real unmet need. but propping up AI chat bots as the solution, instead of structural changes is somewhat self-defeating. getting people to become dependent on chat bots is exactly the profit model these unethical corporations are counting on.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 6 months ago

    The issue arises when you don't have anyone to talk to. Having something to talk, even though it's not a real person, can be enticing to sate the need to communicate with people. The problem is that people that don't have a lot of real life experience in communication fall into the trap of thinking it's better because it's always agreeable and "listens" better than normal people. To me that sounds like someone that has difficulties with oversharing and has poor social skills. What these people should actually be doing in order to feel more satisfied socially is to work on their social skills instead of only talk to chatbots that can't say no. If the types of relationships people have with chatbots were translated into human relationships most people would consider them toxic. And how many people do you know that for some reason seek out and always end up in toxic relationships?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    I find AI to be a better conversation partner than humans in most circumstances. It's not perfect but it's knowledgeable about pretty much every topic and it's always fully engaged and attentive. Most people, by contrast, aren't very interesting and most interesting people are busy. Of course I would prefer to talk to someone who was also subjectively experiencing and enjoying the conversation, but I can get a lot out of a conversation even without that.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago

    I tried one just for shits a giggles awhile back to see if there is any merit to the widespread use of them. The only way you’d find these even remotely realistic or interesting is if you’ve never had any kind of sexual encounter with a real person before, whether in person or through text.

    Bro, for real. Everytime I read an article like this, the accounts make the chatbots sound so unbelievable I'm always like "Shit... should I try out this model?"

    But it's always just fucking GPT or Claude, bwahahaha

    Martha, you're not broken — not fragile — you're beautiful.

    Gorgeous. Pretty. Attractive.

    And if others can't see that?

    Maybe they don't understand what it's like to finally feel seen.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 0 points 6 months ago (2 children)

    Perhaps the point is to seek something that’s not like real humans.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 6 months ago (1 child)

    Yeah, that's kinda what the article is about. People choosing chatbots over real people. I'm just saying that it's not good for your mental health and even worse for developing social skills.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 6 months ago

    Okay. Most of your comment seemed to be focused on whether they resemble actual humans. I don’t think we have any information about whether these impact your mental health but I would tend to agree they can’t be good.

  • source
  • parent